Hate Crime Debate
Is there a need for Stronger Federal Hate Crime Laws ? 


Political Debates and Polls Forum



Youdebate.com Polls
Is there a need for Stronger Federal Hate Crime Laws ?



More Civil Rights

Debates and Polls


Click Here For

More Crime

Debates and Polls


For Debates and Polls

On All Topics

YouDebate Home






Current hate crimes law covers attacks on the basis of race, religion, color or national origin. A bill sponsored by Sens. Edward Kennedy, Arlen Specter, and Ron Wyden would expand federal law to include attacks based on gender, disability or sexual orientation. The measure—to be known upon passage as The Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 1998—would also provide additional resources to investigate and prosecute bias-motivated activity. “Hate crimes are a form of terrorism,” Kennedy said at a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. “They have a psychological and emotional impact which extends far beyond the victim. They threaten the entire community and undermine the ideals from which the nation was founded.”


Critics say the bill is unnecessary since states prosecute hate crimes. They also say the bill would burden the federal courts and discriminate by creating special classes of people with more rights than those not in the protected groups. ``All violent crime, whatever the motivation, is wrong and all victims should receive equal protection under law,'' the conservative Family Research Council said in a statement distributed at the hearing.


PRO 2.1

Eight states have no hate crime laws. Twenty-one states have laws covering sexual orientation, 22 include gender in their anti-bias laws and 21 cover disability.


PRO 2.2

Supporters of the bill, however, claim the legislation is not intended to undermine the role of the states in investigating and prosecuting hate crimes. Instead, it will make resources available to states in need.



In 1996, there were 8,759 hate crimes reported to the FBI: 5,396 incidents based on race, 940 based on ethnicity, 1,401 based on religion and 1,016 based on sexual orientation.



Records show that the government has been selective in its investigation of hate violence. During the past eight years, fewer than 40 federal hate crime incidents have been prosecuted nationwide.


PRO 4.1

The new legislation will eliminate a requirement that prosecutors prove that a bias-motivated crime occurred while the victim was participating in a federally protected activity such as voting, performing jury duty, using federal facilities or attending school. This will allow it to get involved more often.



Alan Keyes has said, The real purpose behind the hate crime legislation movement, is to accord to the government the right to punish attitudes.



Click Here to add Your Thoughts to these Debates