PRO

Where Your Ideas can change Minds

Please visit our new forum at

http://www.4forums.com

CON


YouDebate.com Forum
» back to YouDebate.com
Register | Profile | Log In | Lost Password | Active Users | Help | Board Rules | Search | FAQ |
Custom Search
» You are not logged in.   log in | register

  YouDebate.com Forum
   Politics Debates
     The True Right
       An ultimatum...

Topic Jump
« Back | Next »
[ Single page for this topic ]
Forum moderated by: admin
    

    
DBettino

|     |       Report Post



Newbie
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

When I speak of the Right Wing in America, I am not referring to fiscal conservatism or the Republican agenda.  In fact, I believe proponents of either school are liberals in disguise.  They are in favor of nationalizing countless programs and support massive immigration from the Third World, all policies that fit within the Liberal schema.  It’s time to get serious about the Right.  We must break off allegiances with these weak links.

I am an American nationalist, although I tend to identify more strongly with European identiterian movements.  I am an admirer of Guillaume Faye, and I believe his writings will give anyone here a good perspective on what the Right Wing is all about.

In addition to the extraneous and completely insubstantial Republicans and fiscal conservatives, there is another wholly contradictory school of thought which falls in total defiance of everything for which the Right Wing ought to stand, and that school is the Christian Nationalists.  Christianity – Judeo-Christianity, more precisely – is responsible for infusing into Western culture a perverse set of values, including the deprecation and valuelessness of earthly life, the replacement of pragmatism with abstractness, and egalitarianism, the latter being the greatest threat to the modern world.  Nothing can be achieved by the Right Wing if we are to continue to align ourselves with the Christian agenda, which does not serve our interests.  On the contrary, it is typically the Liberal side that purports vacuous morality in favor of reason, only they disguise it under the cloak of ‘Secular Humanism’ (two inherently contradictory concepts).

A secular lives his life without need of god.  Humanism is born out of a Judeo-Christian ethic of the innate sameness of cultures and peoples, an idea that the true Right Wing deplores.  The concept of ‘Secular Humanism’ is a thinly-veiled attempt at infusing religious moralisms into daily social practice and politics.  

The idea of ‘Christian Nationalism’ is also contradictory.  It is impossible to link a philosophy of cultural nihilism (Christianity) with the school of nationalism that supports the interests and ideas of a singular nation or people.  This ought to be obvious, but somehow opportunists like Pat Robertson have succeeded in blurring the lines.

The Right Wing in the West (which is actually redundant, since the East and Middle East lack our terms of political discourse…the Right Wing agenda is necessarily Western) must concern itself primarily with the threats to its stability, and must develop strategies to counter these threats.  The greatest threat, sadly, comes from within, from our Western governments.  These governments across the board in the West operate on the basis of short-term economic solutions.  As such, they have allowed en masse immigration from the Third World.  The promise of multiculturalism is a phony one, bred out of Judeo-Christian egalitarianism, and must be abandoned.  Cultures are not interchangeable.  Guillaume Faye puts it simply: ‘…a Brazilian is not exchangeable with a Russian.’  And to see this concept played out in all its inadequacies, one need only take a cursory glance at the ethnic situation in the country of Faye’s origin, France.  

France is on the brink of ethnic warfare because of its indiscriminate immigration policy.  The recent riots in Paris are a perfect illustration.  While the rest of the Western world clamored (in traditional Liberal fashion) to search for Marxist, socio-economic explanations for the ethnic tension, the rioters were united in their intransigent faith in Allah, for the issue, to them, was a religious one.  And if that was not so, I ask you to consider why, out of all the ‘socially displaced’ minorities in France, were Muslims the only ones taking part in these riots?  Why were people killed?  Why were churches burned?  I am certainly no friend of the Church, but I am willing to defend it in favor of doing what the ‘Secular Humanists’ would have us do: that is, invite the Mosque.  I ask you to consider the statistics: every year, the French state spends $44 billion a year on its immigrants.  It provides six-month temporary boarding, and many Muslim immigrants receive better health care than nationalized citizens.  Shall we continue to accept the lie that they have been socially displaced in France?  Whatever strife they endure is not the result of racism, but rather immigration, as the French state simply does not possess the resources to accommodate the massive influx of Arab immigrants.  Marseilles is now a French slum.  One cannot even walk around in Marseilles on Friday, because there is not enough space within the central mosque and Muslims pour out into the streets, handing out mimeographed pamphlets praising Jihad against the West.  This is going on in France!  France, the mouthpiece for the Occidental world, which houses our greatest art, architecture, our greatest food…the bastion of Western culture, invaded and spat upon by Muslim immigrants.  In the words of Oriana Fallaci, ‘Wake up, West!’

Let me clarify that the greatest indirect threat to the stability of the Western World is the behavior of our governments, but the greatest direct threat is the Islamic invasion.  To even call it ‘terrorism’ is a whitewash, since terrorism is nothing more than a tool of the Islamic expansionist movement that menaces our entire way of life.

The war on the West will be carried out in three phases: Dar al-Suhl, Dar al-Harb, and Dar al-Islam.  Dar al-Suhl refers, among other things, to areas not yet under Islamic control.  Dar al-Islam is the complete subjugation of the non-believers.  The middle ground is Dar al-Harb, which refers to areas not yet under Islamic control, but ripe for invasion.  Every year, an Islamic yearbook is published in Egypt, and a couple of years back, it listed France, Belgium, and the UK as nations in the Dar al-Harb phase.  Portentous, to say the least, considering the recent riots.  It is also overlooked that Islam is deceitful on principal, as the Koran allows lying, as long as the lie serves the purposes of Islam.  The Grand Mufti of Paris, Dalil Bobakeur, publicly condemned the Church burnings, but took no measure to excommunicate those responsible.  

These problems exist in the West because we have swallowed the lies of pluriculturalism.  Immigration presents no greater problem than that of the Muslim invasion, but consider the immigration issues in this country for an example on a smaller scale.  A staggering number of illegal Mexican immigrant youth have turned to organized crime.  In Southern California, they are now engaging in vicious turf wars with Black gangs.  What is this, I ask, if not ethnic warfare?  That’s right.  And it’s not happening in Bosnia, it’s happening here.

Speaking of Bosnia, let us now turn our attention to the Balkans, the starting point of the last two World Wars, and probably the origin of the third.  The region has endured its fair share of unspeakable violence, but let us focus on the recent Bosnian War.  It is conventionally thought that the Serbs inflicted the greatest casualties, were the deciding hand in the most horrendous war crimes.  One might even troll Wikipedia and type in ‘Srebrenica massacre’ for an account of Western media impressions on the conflict.  The information listed is completely unsubstantiated, and those that have pursued the truth are listed under the heading ‘Genocide deniers and revisionists.’  Meanwhile, perhaps the greatest war criminal in the conflict, Alija Izetbegovic, is listed in Wikipedia as a benevolent peace activist – a man soaked in the blood of Serbian women and children.  Why is this, you ask?  Because Izetbegovic was a Muslim, and a friend to the West.  Clinton and NATO supported the mujihadeen in Bosnia, who were aligned with Croatia in killing the Serbs.  In a weekend, NATO forces, Croatian paramilitary units, and Muslim mercenaries  - led by an American general - evacuated about 200,000 Serbs from their homes – in a weekend! – and they killed about 25,000.  It was called Operation Storm.  Go ahead and look it up, if you are able to find any credible information on it.

Using the critical support granted to them by Western powers, radical Islam established a political base in the Balkans.  Out of the 19 terrorist perpetrators of 9/11, eleven possessed Bosnian passports.  Bin Laden himself was issued a Bosnian passport.  It is my belief that 9/11 would not have occurred had our government not aligned itself with Islamic expansionism in Bosnia.  The Madrid and London bombings could also have been avoided.  How could our government have done this to us?

We can no longer turn to them.  The Liberals have taken their stand, as flaccid as it is, for multiculturalism, tolerance, ‘turning the other cheek’, etc.  They have granted haven to the enemy.  They have allowed Muslim interests to manipulate the European Union, advocating the issue of European Arrest Warrants to prosecute those that criticize Islam for ‘religious discrimination.’  In Switzerland, an animal rights activist was put in jail under article 261b of the Criminal Code, which basically allows any Muslim to win any lawsuit invoking ‘xenophobia.’  Criticism of the Pope is acceptable in democratic societies because it is expression of the right of free speech, but in these same democratic societies criticism of Islam is an offense punishable by imprisonment.  Muslim immigrants invade the West under the call of Jihad, wielding their Korans and praising Allah, and the leftists have granted them sanctuary and extra provisions under the law.  Their cattle calls can even be heard in the Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park.   Indeed, the multiculturalists have taken their stand.

Now, we must take ours, for the sake of the Occidental World.  It is the Right that must stand up and fight…because no one else will do it.

Thanks for listening.


(Edited by DBettino 10/12/2006 at 4:51 PM).

(Edited by DBettino 10/12/2006 at 4:57 PM).


-------
Wake up, West!
-Oriana Fallaci
 


Posts: 14 | Posted: 4:48 PM on October 12, 2006 | IP
gman

|     |       Report Post



Junior Member
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Dbettino,
    Well spoken. Apparently ignored. The truth seems to be fraught with details that few have interest in debating. Or perhaps they have simply not understood that they are being accused of vichy style collabortion with perptarators of jihad. They'd be wise to read and wake up.
    Muslims are not Nazi's. Although Facist, they are much more and outnumber those they hate. Without response, the only hope non Muslims have is hope for an afterlife. It is time for war with Islam. Not based on religious differences but for the sake of survival. There is no negotiating with people who by their own word, want nothing more than for non-Muslims to be dead.

I do however reject your stand against Christianity.
But, respect your right to choose a religion or lack of.

(Edited by gman 11/27/2006 at 11:27 AM).


-------
The Government that governs least, governs best.
R.R.
 


Posts: 25 | Posted: 10:00 AM on November 27, 2006 | IP
    
[ Single page for this topic ]

Topic Jump
« Back | Next »
[ Single page for this topic ]
Forum moderated by: admin
    

Topic options: Lock topic | Unlock topic | Make Topic Sticky | Remove Sticky | Delete thread | Move thread | Merge thread

 

© YouDebate.com
Powered by: ScareCrow version 2.12
© 2001 Jonathan Bravata. All rights reserved.