PRO

Where Your Ideas can change Minds

Please visit our new forum at

http://www.4forums.com

CON


YouDebate.com Forum
» back to YouDebate.com
Register | Profile | Log In | Lost Password | Active Users | Help | Board Rules | Search | FAQ |
Custom Search
» You are not logged in.   log in | register

  YouDebate.com Forum
   Gay Rights Debates
     Why scientific definition bs
       Gay Adoption

Topic Jump
Next »
[ Single page for this topic ]
Forum moderated by: admin
    

    
Heteroman

|     |       Report Post




Newbie
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

I have noticed all the fags and fag supporters simply dismiss the statistical evidence showing that fags commit a disproportionate number of child molestations by coming up with a "scientific definition" of homosexuality. This definition is contrary to the TRADITIONAL understanding of homosexuality meaning an attraction to persons of the same gender. The traditional definition is IRRELEVENT of the same-sex object of the beholder's age bracket. Problem with the scientific definition is no empirical evidence is presented to JUSTIFY why only adult same-sex attractions are homosexual. Especially when there is ALREADY a term for homosexuals attracted to adults, and that is "Androphile." Also, another problem to the scientific definition is the fact that many teens attracted to other teens, identify themselves as homosexuals. Are they straight simply because they have no attraction to older men? Also, there is the factor of even amongst adults the FACT that many 50 something year olds are only attracted to 19 or 20 year olds. And then there is the problem of where do we draw the line between a 17 year old and an 18 year old?
This is the problem of judging a person's sexual orientation by their adult sexual relations.

Another factor overlooked is that there are NUMEROUS homosexuals still in the closet, either because they are afraid of how their loved ones will react to finding out they are gay or they "want" to be straight. Such types can have sex with male children, and still say they are "straight." And the new scientific definition allows them now to be heterosexual while knocking themselves out having same-sex intergenerational sex! This same bullshit reasoning has also been done when it comes to prison rapes. They argue that such persons if they had heterosexual relations before prison are really heterosexual, even though they rape male prisoners. Problem with this is to any heterosexual male the idea of having sex with another man regardless of how hny they are is repulsive. There are other alternatives for releasing sexual frustrations such as masturbation and pornography is provided in most prisons anyways! Heck, they even get a PORNO STATION for fuck's sake using *OUR* hard earned tax dollars! Also, the theory that they sodomize other prisoners for "humiliation" and "power" reasons also does not work, as I can think of a ton of ways to humiliate or impose power over a person other than sticking my dick up some guy's ass or in his mouth. Also, what's overlooked is a SIGNIFICANT amount of prison rape is done by PRISON GUARDS whom being free, have ready access to women. What excuse is there for prison guards to rape male prisoners? The only explaination is they are homosexual or bisexual. As many prisons allow male guards to serve in women's prisons, the fact you don't hear much about female rape, shows that homosexual prison guards rape male prisoners at a much greater rate, than heterosexual guards rape female prisoners.

All this shows is, like it or not, fags have a psychotic predilection to *LITERALLY* force their sexuality on heterosexuals against our wills. It gives fags a THRILL everytime they violate the body of a heterosexual male (young or old alike), and they love the idea of over-powering a heterosexual male. It turns fags on! That is, unconsensual sex with heterosexual males REALLY turns fags on! That's why they love to molest children (because children are physically and psychologically weak, compared to a full grown 30 something year old male) or to rape skinny weak heterosexuals.

Either way, we can see the homosexual agenda is about the homosexualization of our population. The aim of the homosexual movement is NOT genuine and legitimate civil rights as minorities and women strive for,  but the total transformation of society and the total eradication of heterosexuality. And those who support this, have their blood on the genitals of all heterosexual males (young and old alike) molested by these monsters. I hope you fags get what you want, so that people like me can whip the lemonhead masses into an anti-fag frenzy and start a revolution to turn the clock back. When more and MORE parents see their kids being sexually abused and their molester being protected by gay rights legislation, TRUST ME, parents *WILL* take to the streets and every tree from New York to Honolulu will have a fag and a fag supporting traitor swinging from its branches. This I promise! It's best for fags to settle for tolerance, and to simply go into the closet where you all belong. Other wise, you may become examples of the ol' adage "be careful for what you wish for, because you might just GET it!" And if pedophile friendly legislature ever passes and my son gets molested by some fag, believe me, a WHOLE bunch of queers will "get it." I am a very gentle man, but when it comes to my son or any future children I will have with my fiance, I don't play around!

Heteroman


-------
http://www.accessnow.com/ahwa/graphics/NYC_Flag.jpg
 


Posts: 13 | Posted: 4:34 PM on January 27, 2003 | IP
Guest

|     |       Report Post



Newbie
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

i agree the scientific definition is kinda worthless talking about this. I mean, a 15 year old who is attracted to another 15 year can still be gay. the object of your desire does not have to be over 18. i certainly was gay before i started dating other adults. but otherwise, what you are saying is so hypocritical. your argument is worthless because you ONLY accept statistics that are given by people who accept your viewpoint by virtue of their own rejection of homosexuality. you dismiss all vast majority of experts because they ae "liberal fags". that is just absurd, and is just an easy way of disregarding the facts. the accepted truth in the medical community is that pedophilia is a condition wholly separate from sexual orientation. your whole argument rests on this not being true, but you offer no reason beyond "it's a big fag conspiracy" for us to not believe the experts. so why should anyone believe your sources over these? i know you are just going to say, "shut up fag, that is just a big fag biased statement, go back to your fag hole!" blah blah blah. the more you curse the dumber you look, because everyone sees it is just your way of filling a post that has no sound arguments.

lemme ask you another question? do you REALLY think I personally want to molest your kid? do you REALLY think I personally want to "homosexualize" the population? don't you think, honestly, that sounds, quite simply, REALLY stupid?

-Alex
 


Posts: 0 | Posted: 5:26 PM on January 27, 2003 | IP
Guest

|     |       Report Post



Newbie
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Quote from Guest at 5:26 PM on January 27, 2003 :
i agree the scientific definition is kinda worthless talking about this. I mean, a 15 year old who is attracted to another 15 year can still be gay. the object of your desire does not have to be over 18. i certainly was gay before i started dating other adults. but otherwise, what you are saying is so hypocritical. your argument is worthless because you ONLY accept statistics that are given by people who accept your viewpoint by virtue of their own rejection of homosexuality. you dismiss all vast majority of experts because they ae "liberal fags". that is just absurd, and is just an easy way of disregarding the facts. the accepted truth in the medical community is that pedophilia is a condition wholly separate from sexual orientation. your whole argument rests on this not being true, but you offer no reason beyond "it's a big fag conspiracy" for us to not believe the experts. so why should anyone believe your sources over these? i know you are just going to say, "shut up fag, that is just a big fag biased statement, go back to your fag hole!" blah blah blah. the more you curse the dumber you look, because everyone sees it is just your way of filling a post that has no sound arguments.

lemme ask you another question? do you REALLY think I personally want to molest your kid? do you REALLY think I personally want to "homosexualize" the population? don't you think, honestly, that sounds, quite simply, REALLY stupid?

-Alex




My sources come from newspapers and peer-reviewed studies, two of which were written by fags! According to police statistics (and you can look this up for YOURSELF if you don't believe me) over 1/3 of convicted child molesters are men that had boy victims. How come less than 5% of the population is responsible for more than 33% of all sexual abuse? And even if we believe the 10% farce, still, 10% of the population should NOT be responsible for over 33% of child molestations.

I dismiss the "experts" for the simple reason there was no empirical evidence presented as to WHY they came to the conclusion they did! Stating "Most Pedophiles that molest boys aren't homosexual, since a homosexual is someone's who's sexual relations with adults is also homosexual" is NOT empirical evidence. It's simply stating an opinion! I want to see empirical evidence that a Pedophile attracted to boys is not a bonified genuine fudge-packer. Especially when the sight of a little boys' DICK and BALLS makes him drool and pop a bonner! Either way only TWO experts were presented. I presented numerous peer reviewed studies and newspaper articles to support my position. The very FACT Pedophile activists like NAMBLA consider themselves GAY does not seem to mean anything to you fags and your liberal idiot allies, simply because you are AFRAID if most parents knew the truth every fag in this country would be hanging from a tree and the gay quarters of every major city from San Francisco to New York would be raised to the ground! This is why the facts are distorted and "experts" redefine what homosexuality means, in order to falsely claim that fags are no more a danger to children than heterosexuals.

Fact remains, I hope you fags get EVERYTHING you need. For parents and other lemonhead heterosexuals that see homosexuality as something "indifferent" to finally see the light, they need to EXPERIENCE the true nature of the gay rights agenda for THEMSELVES!!! When children are raped by homosexual teachers and scoutmasters, and it becomes open season on any heterosexual male a fag desires, and a parent or raped heterosexual complains about their abuse and they get charged with a "hate crime" for complaining, THEN they will wake up and see that gay rights was a mistake. They will be stirred to action by their feelings of frustration, and every fag in the land will be hoisted up a tree and cleansed from this glorious land. America needs another revolution, and believe me, the kind of tyranny you fags want to inflict on us, *WILL* stir the people of this nation to action. So I really DO hope you fags get what you want, so I can get what I want, and that's to take part in a massive nation-wide gay extermination campaign!

Heteroman

 


Posts: 0 | Posted: 6:48 PM on January 27, 2003 | IP
Guest

|     |       Report Post



Newbie
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Alexander the Gay you said:

"lemme ask you another question? do you REALLY think I personally want to molest your kid?"

I did not say all fags were pedophiles. But a SIGNIFICANT number of fags DO have pedophile tendencies. I already posted two studies from gay researchers, in which a significant percentage of homosexual adults ADMIT to having had sexual relations with minors. Also keep in mind, they admit to DOING IT! I am sure some of those that did not molest a child, do think about it. But of course, I believe there are indeed homosexuals only attracted to adults. You can tell, as these types like guys with "manly" features and facial hair. It's OBVIOUS these are pure androphiles. As for you, even though you may not be a pedophile orientated fag (although I doubt it) I still would not trust you around my kid! Nor do I think any other LOVING and CARING parents should trust their little boys around you either!

"do you REALLY think I personally want to "homosexualize" the population?"

Maybe and maybe not. But the brains behind the gay rights movements DO want to homosexualize the population. This I firmly believe! The fact blatantly pedophile organizations such as NAMBLA have been allowed to march in gay rights groups and was and still is a member in good standing of mainstream gay rights organizations, plus the only block of people that favour lowering or abolishing age of consent laws are fags, shows that fags want to homosexualize society! The aim to teach gay sex acts to kindergarten kids and gay adoption, are all a part of the agenda of turning society into one big gay land, where everyone is gay and heterosexuality is a "thing of the past!"
 
"don't you think, honestly, that sounds, quite simply, REALLY stupid?"

It sounds accurate, based on the EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE before me! Also, pedophilia I AGREE is not the same thing as homosexuality. There are heterosexual pedophiles too, so that makes it OBVIOUS! But the fact remains while pedophilia is an entity onto itself, there is LOTS of overlap between pedophilia and homosexuality and heterosexuality. Pedophilia describes the age of preferrence of a person, NOT their sexual orientation. In that sense the medical researchers are correct. HOWEVER pedophiles have gender PREFERRENCES when it comes to children, THIS is sexual orientation. While the majority of pedophiles molest girls (which should be expected in a society when heterosexuals make up 95% of the population), the FACT remains that over 33% of child molestation victims are boys. And since child molesters are invariably males and only a negligible percentage of child molesters are females, that means that homosexuals and those homosexually orientated comprise a DISPROPORTIONATE percentage of child molestation cases. A pedophile can be heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual. Therefore, it can be said that while not all pedophiles are homosexual, a disproportionate number of pedophiles ARE! Therefore, all fags can be legitimately suspected of being POTENTIAL child molesters. Especially when you have 25% of white homosexuals ADMITTING in a study by GAYS that they have had a sexual relationship with boys under age 16! And ESPECIALLY when gay newspapers have ads for boy prostitutes, boy prostitutes in major cities choose GAY neighborhoods to ply their trade (notice they don't choose the suburbs or areas where most people are heterosexual?), and the fact that one of my posts features evidence from a gay foster home of children being sexually abused by staff members! Sorry but there is MORE than enough EMPIRICAL evidence to justify the way I feel about fags!

Heteroman


 


Posts: 0 | Posted: 7:13 PM on January 27, 2003 | IP
Guest

|     |       Report Post



Newbie
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Come on heteroman lets talk about your slut girlfriend and bastard child instead of your usual BS.
 


Posts: 0 | Posted: 06:56 AM on January 28, 2003 | IP
Guest

|     |       Report Post



Newbie
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Quote from Guest at 06:56 AM on January 28, 2003 :
Come on heteroman lets talk about your slut girlfriend and bastard child instead of your usual BS.


Want to say that to my face you fucking faggot piece of shit? As for my FIANCE we are getting married this summer. And she is FAR from a slut. There is only TWO guys she's ever had sex with in her life, and I am one of them. The one before me was her ex-boyfriend who she has been with since high school. And she was with him for four years. She's FAR from a slut you dickhead, unlike you fags that can't stick to one person at a time. We live as a married couple, act as a married couple, and raise our son in a stable home environment. The only difference between us and the Clevers is the piece of paper which we are getting this summer. As far as I am concerned we are already married! She is a bank manager, and I have my own business and make more money than all you fags combined will ever see in your lifetimes. Put it THAT way! I come from a family with money and my son goes to private school. You don't get more stable and normal than that!

Heteroman


 


Posts: 0 | Posted: 4:41 PM on January 28, 2003 | IP
Guest

|     |       Report Post



Newbie
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Dear Alex,
If your still reading responces from your post
I'd like to say you must enjoy Heteroman.
Gay people are humans as all of us are.  You
just don't need to tell the world that you are or rather why do gays have to keep yelling for
approval?  IF  you have to answer to anyone it
would be God (if infact you believe in God) and
on that the bible says believe in the Lord Jesus Christ as you personal Savior and you
will  be saved.  It says nothing about your sexual preference.  I think gays should take a
moral inventory of themselves and live like you
please without having to beg for exceptance.
God bless you and I send you love.  I'm a married female with no interest in anyone's sex
life but mine.  Mr Heteroman has a lot of verbal
vomit coming out of his mouth.  Bless You!!
 


Posts: 0 | Posted: 2:16 PM on October 18, 2003 | IP
    
[ Single page for this topic ]

Topic Jump
Next »
[ Single page for this topic ]
Forum moderated by: admin
    

Topic options: Lock topic | Unlock topic | Make Topic Sticky | Remove Sticky | Delete thread | Move thread | Merge thread

 

© YouDebate.com
Powered by: ScareCrow version 2.12
© 2001 Jonathan Bravata. All rights reserved.