PRO

Political & Fun Debates Forum with Polls

CON

Harvard Business Review Magazine People Magazine Gift Subscription

YouDebate.com Forum
» back to YouDebate.com
Register | Profile | Log In | Lost Password | Active Users | Help | Board Rules | Search | FAQ |
Custom Search
» You are not logged in.   log in | register

  YouDebate.com Forum
   Creationism vs Evolution Debates
     Constructive VS Destructive
       A classification of energy by Doctor Lester

Topic Jump
« Back | Next »
[ Single page for this topic ]
Forum moderated by: admin
    

    
wisp

|      |       Report Post




Fanatic
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Quote from Lester10 at 1:43 PM on July 30, 2010, in the thread amino acids = life?:
Apoapsis
Please open any textbook on thermodynamics and try to find a reference to "constructive" vs. "destructive" energy, the distinction exists only in the imagination of creationists.
Energy is energy. The effects are constructive or destructive.

Without a mechanism to utilize the energy, the effect is destructive. Maybe the distinction should start to exist in the minds of evolutionists as well.
Oh, my! A claim!

Care to defend it?



-------
Lester
(...) since convergent evolution does NOT lead to homology.
According to people who believe in convergent evolution, it does lead to homologous structures by pure chance mutations in different lines altogether.
porkchop
Would we see a mammal by the water's edge "suddenly" start breathing underwater(w/camera effect of course)?
Contact me at youdebate.1wr@gishpuppy.com
 


Posts: 2551 | Posted: 4:48 PM on July 30, 2010 | IP
wisp

|      |       Report Post




Fanatic
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:


This guy is applying energy. Can you please classify it, Lester?

Thanks in advance.



-------
Lester
(...) since convergent evolution does NOT lead to homology.
According to people who believe in convergent evolution, it does lead to homologous structures by pure chance mutations in different lines altogether.
porkchop
Would we see a mammal by the water's edge "suddenly" start breathing underwater(w/camera effect of course)?
Contact me at youdebate.1wr@gishpuppy.com
 


Posts: 2551 | Posted: 5:03 PM on July 30, 2010 | IP
Apoapsis

|     |       Report Post



Fanatic
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

You can expect this to be totally ignored. . .


-------
Pogge:” This is the volume of a sphere with a 62 kilometer (about 39 miles) radius, which is considerably smaller than the 2,000 mile radius of the Earth.”
Wikipedia:” For Earth, the mean radius is 6,371.009 km(≈3,958.761 mi; ≈3,440.069 nmi).”
Wisp to Lester (on Pogge): Do you admit he was wrong about the basics?
Lester: No

 


Posts: 1348 | Posted: 11:24 PM on July 31, 2010 | IP
Lester10

|     |       Report Post



Fanatic
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

The effects of energy are constructive or destructive.

What don't you understand here?


-------
Richard Lewontin: “We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism... no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door”
 


Posts: 1308 | Posted: 07:55 AM on August 1, 2010 | IP
Apoapsis

|     |       Report Post



Fanatic
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Quote from Lester10 at 07:55 AM on August 1, 2010 :
The effects of energy are constructive or destructive.

What don't you understand here?


And the motion of any particle in the universe is either away from me, toward me, or stationary.

Really helpful isn't it?



-------
Pogge:” This is the volume of a sphere with a 62 kilometer (about 39 miles) radius, which is considerably smaller than the 2,000 mile radius of the Earth.”
Wikipedia:” For Earth, the mean radius is 6,371.009 km(≈3,958.761 mi; ≈3,440.069 nmi).”
Wisp to Lester (on Pogge): Do you admit he was wrong about the basics?
Lester: No

 


Posts: 1348 | Posted: 10:01 AM on August 1, 2010 | IP
derwood

|      |       Report Post




Fanatic
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Quote from Lester10 at 07:55 AM on August 1, 2010 :
The effects of energy are constructive or destructive.

What don't you understand here?

How you can try to cover up your previous silly proclamation by implying you meant something else and think nobody will notice.




-------
Lester:

"I said I have a doctorate and a university background in anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, physics, chemistry, pathology etc. ..."
 


Posts: 1355 | Posted: 10:02 AM on August 1, 2010 | IP
wisp

|      |       Report Post




Fanatic
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

You're still classifying energy according to its effects.

Tell me about a boiling egg. What was the effect of the heat? Classify it, please. Perhaps i'll get to understand what you're talking about.



-------
Lester
(...) since convergent evolution does NOT lead to homology.
According to people who believe in convergent evolution, it does lead to homologous structures by pure chance mutations in different lines altogether.
porkchop
Would we see a mammal by the water's edge "suddenly" start breathing underwater(w/camera effect of course)?
Contact me at youdebate.1wr@gishpuppy.com
 


Posts: 2551 | Posted: 5:40 PM on August 1, 2010 | IP
wisp

|      |       Report Post




Fanatic
Post Score
Adjustment:
n/a

Rate this post:

Quote from Lester10 at 05:01 AM on August 5, 2010 in the thread Louis Pasteur:
Derwood, about Pogge
One wonders why anyone would take such an obvious egomaniacal Dunning-Krugerite seriously.
Perhaps because he uses evidential support for what he asserts and thus makes far more practical sense than you do.
Sorry, what? Something about evidential support?


-------
Lester
(...) since convergent evolution does NOT lead to homology.
According to people who believe in convergent evolution, it does lead to homologous structures by pure chance mutations in different lines altogether.
porkchop
Would we see a mammal by the water's edge "suddenly" start breathing underwater(w/camera effect of course)?
Contact me at youdebate.1wr@gishpuppy.com
 


Posts: 2551 | Posted: 9:19 PM on August 10, 2010 | IP
    
[ Single page for this topic ]

Topic Jump
« Back | Next »
[ Single page for this topic ]
Forum moderated by: admin
    

Topic options: Lock topic | Unlock topic | Make Topic Sticky | Remove Sticky | Delete thread | Move thread | Merge thread

 

© YouDebate.com
Powered by: ScareCrow version 2.12
© 2001 Jonathan Bravata. All rights reserved.